SWORT
SWORT LLC, operating as SWORT Aerospace
Registered in New Mexico  ·  swort.net

Investor Relations

Aerospace systems cannot act reliably on data they cannot verify.

SWORT is building commercial sensor-integrity technology and protected advanced architectures for autonomous and mission-critical aerospace systems.

Investment thesis

Autonomy has outgrown the assumption that sensors are honest.

Flight stacks were built to fuse sensors, not to decide which ones deserve to be believed. As platforms take on more authority, that gap becomes the constraint.

The problem
Estimators blend navigation, inertial, magnetic, and environmental inputs into a single state. When one channel degrades quietly, through interference, drift, a failing part, or an inconsistent environment, the blended state degrades with it, and the platform continues acting on a number nothing challenged.
Why it persists
Redundancy answers whether a sensor is present, not whether it is right. Voting schemes need identical channels. Thresholds catch outright failures and miss slow ones. The flight controller cannot audit its own inputs because it is downstream of them.
SSIL, the commercial path
An independent integrity layer that evaluates residual consistency across sensor channels and outputs source-level health, trust, and fault-state signals to the vehicle stack. It is explainable by design, which is what makes it sellable into civil, commercial, and research programs.
CSIA, protected
A separate, protected cross-sensor intelligence architecture aimed at defense-oriented applications. Its algorithms, tuning, and implementation are not published, not described here, and are handled only under written agreement.
Why this team can execute
SWORT does the electronics work itself: flight computer design, GNC hardware, PCB layout, embedded firmware, telemetry, and bench verification. An integrity layer has to be proven against real hardware behaviour, and SWORT builds the hardware it tests against.
What this page does not do. It is not an offer to sell securities, a solicitation of an offer to buy, or a statement that SWORT is currently raising. It is company information for qualified parties who ask for it.

Technical evidence

What has actually been built.

Deliberately narrow. Anything not verified is absent rather than softened.

0
Flight logs analysed
Recorded flights, measured
0
Automated tests
Regression harness, measured
0
Fault modes evaluated
Plus a clean baseline, measured
0%
Clean-baseline rate
24 of 26 logs alarm-free
Flight outcome Measured · n = 26

Twenty-four of twenty-six recorded flights replayed with no state change. Three transitions total across 0.663 flight-hours, a candidate false-alarm rate of 4.5 per flight-hour on an offline posture. Sample is small and the flights are third-party recordings, not SWORT test articles.

Telemetry completeness Measured · n = 26

Channels present per flight across IMU, barometer, battery, GNSS and magnetometer. The pipeline ran on every log, including the partial ones.

Flight time analysed Measured · cumulative, 26 logs

Logs ordered shortest to longest. 39.8 minutes, 0.663 flight-hours in total. Recorded flights replayed offline, not a flight-test campaign.

Flight-log outcome Measured · n = 26
Alarm-free 24
Inconsistency raised 2

Largest single inconsistency identified: a 55 m navigation disagreement. Bench and simulation analysis of recorded flights. Not a flight-test result.

Embedded execution cost Measured range · native C
00 ns per tick

Per-tick execution time of the native-C implementation, measured. Approximately 0.04% of an STM32H743 at 25 Hz: that percentage is an estimate derived from the measured tick, not a figure taken from flight hardware.

01
Working integrity pipeline

A causal processing pipeline exists as an installable package with a command-line interface and a local dashboard. It ingests synchronized telemetry and emits per-source trust and fault state.

02
Automated test coverage

The pipeline carries an automated test harness, including a test that asserts no lookahead: a decision at any timestep uses only data available at that timestep.

03
Fault-mode simulation

Scenario runs cover navigation inconsistency, inertial bias drift, and clean-baseline cases, with recorded logs and plotted trust behaviour over time.

04
Aerospace electronics capability

Flight computer, GNC hardware, PCB, telemetry, recovery electronics, and embedded firmware are delivered as scoped engineering work, source-complete.

Stated limits. The results above come from simulation and bench-level work. SWORT has not completed hardware-in-the-loop qualification, flight testing, certification, or production deployment, and does not claim them. Detailed logs, scenario definitions, and figures are shared under agreement rather than published, and are dated and scoped when shared.

Milestones

Completed, current, next.

Completed
Company formed and registered. SSIL architecture defined and separated from protected CSIA work. Causal integrity pipeline implemented, tested, and instrumented, with a native embedded core measured at 247 to 427 ns per tick. Fault-mode coverage extended to six injected scenarios plus a clean baseline, evaluated against 26 recorded flights. Verification formalised as a 41-test automated regression harness, including a test that asserts no lookahead. Software-in-the-loop validation passed against an autonomous mission profile. A commercial integration path committed on a partner platform, and a maintained technical documentation set covering requirements, architecture review, failure modes and effects, and hardware commissioning. Aerospace-electronics engineering capability delivered on customer-funded work.
Current
Hardware-in-the-loop validation on the target flight computer. Each comparator is being calibrated against real sensor noise on the bench rather than the simulator’s noise budget, which is the one step simulation cannot substitute for, followed by instrumented ground and hover runs.
Next
Fault rehearsal on hardware with propulsion disabled, then tethered flight with the layer advisory only. Command authority is enabled last, in simulation first and tethered after, and only once the advisory record supports it. The sequence is deliberate: nothing acts on a vehicle until it has been observed not to cry wolf.
Milestone dates are not published. SWORT will not put a schedule on a public page that it cannot commit to contractually.

Use of capital

Where investment would go.

Categories, not percentages. A specific allocation is provided with the financial model, not on a public page.

01
Embedded productization

Moving SSIL from a validated pipeline to a deployable embedded component.

02
Hardware-in-the-loop validation

Rigs, instrumentation, and fault-injection capability against representative hardware.

03
Flight testing

Platform access and instrumented test campaigns.

04
Engineering capacity

Engineering hires and contractors across embedded, avionics, and validation.

05
Compliance planning

Documentation and process work to support future qualification and export-control obligations.

06
Customer integrations

Integration engineering on partner and customer platforms, and laboratory access.

Investor access

Request investor materials.

SWORT reviews each request before sharing anything. Company materials are provided after qualification, not automatically.

Investor and strategic inquiries may also be sent directly to andrfp@swort.net. General program and business inquiries are handled at contact@swort.net.

Before you submit: Do not submit confidential, export-controlled, proprietary technical, financial, or client information through this form. Submissions are handled by SWORT directly and are not routed through a third-party form processor. No attachments are accepted.

Request received

A person reads every request. If there is a fit, SWORT will follow up to qualify the request before sharing any company materials.

Nothing confidential is sent automatically. Materials such as a deck, financial model, use-of-funds plan, cap table, data-room access, or technical diligence content are provided only after qualification and, where appropriate, under a written agreement.

Also relevant

Not an investor?

Technical sponsorship, laboratory or platform access, and research collaboration are handled separately.